The case of the world No. 1 in men's tennis is at the center of anti-doping protocols and reforms that could redefine its parameters.

M any players and insiders are convinced that the agreement between Jannik Sinner and WADA was not the right way to solve the doping case that involved the world number 1. After t

Although he had been acquitted in the first instance, Jannik Sinner understood that it was better to accept the agreement with WADA by avoiding arriving at the hearing before the CAS in Lausanne. The world number 1 has suffered a three-month suspension that will expire on May 4,

The men's world No. 1 will miss several tournaments, but no Grand Slams. Here's what to know about the doping proceedings against him.

Jannik Sinner reluctantly agreed to a three-month suspension after “tricky” conversations with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The world No. 1, who lifted the Australian Open title last month, has been banned until May 4 after two positive drug tests in 2024.

The World Anti-Doping Agency told the BBC that it rejected criticism of the settlement reached with the men’s World No 1

The case of the world No. 1 in men's tennis is at the center of anti-doping protocols and reforms that could redefine its parameters.

Jannik Sinner received a 3-month ban after testing positive for a banned substance, with the Italian initially refusing to accept he would face a suspension.

Sinner asked: "Why would we do that if the first independent tribunal found it was no ban at all, why would I accept three months now?"