Efforts by the Trump administration to drastically cut federal investments in medical research are threatening to kneecap ...
Universities that do breakthrough-level studies are scrambling to understand the effects as their funding agencies slash ...
Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...
The National Institutes of Health, the primary source of federal funding for medical research in the U.S., announced Feb. 7 ...
The federal order temporarily halts the Trump administration’s plans to slash $4 billion in overhead costs for research at ...
But that's not so. Indirect costs include lab space, data storage, regulatory compliance and administrative support. The ...
A new policy for how the National Institutes of Health will reimburse overhead costs associated with research grants could result in the loss of significant funding at institutions like UT Austin.
On Jan. 26, the Trump administration issued a funding freeze on trillions of dollars in federal funding, making waves through ...
The US National Science Foundation has unfrozen grant funding, but it continues to scrutinize research projects, sowing ...
Should they hold up in court, the cuts are very likely to cost jobs at OHSU and perhaps beyond. United for Medical Research, ...
Staff members search for spending on “climate science,” “climate crisis” and “pollution” as one of the world’s premier ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results